Because the target platform of Scala.js is quite different from that of Scala, a few language semantics differences exist.

Numbers and characters

Numbers and characters have the same semantics as on the JVM (including overflow and full 64-bit Longs) with the following four exceptions. For information about how Scala numeric types map to JavaScript numeric types, have a look at the interoparability guide.

Floats may behave like Doubles

Since JavaScript doesn't have a native float type, we sometimes represent Floats using doubles/numbers, rather than with lower-precision 32-bit floats.

The choice of how to represent floats is up to the implementation. You may not rely on floats providing 64-bit floating point precision.

Float literals are truncated to their (binary) precision. However, output does not truncate to that precision. This can lead to the following behavior (this works as expected when using doubles):

// Scala:    13.345
// Scala.js: 13.345000267028809

Integer division by 0 is undefined

Unlike the JVM where dividing an integer type by 0 throws an exception, in Scala.js integer division by 0 is undefined. This allows for efficient implementation of division. Dividing a Double or Float by 0 yields positive or negative infinity as expected.

isInstanceOf tests are based on value

Instance tests (and consequently pattern matching) on any of Byte, Short, Int, Float, Double are based on the value and not the type they were created with. The following are examples:

  • 1 matches Byte, Short, Int, Float, Double
  • 128 (> Byte.MaxValue) matches Short, Int, Float, Double
  • 32768 (> Short.MaxValue) matches Int, Float, Double
  • 2147483648 (> Int.MaxValue) matches Float, Double
  • 1.2 matches Float, Double

As a consequence, the following apparent subtyping relationship holds:

Byte <:< Short <:< Int <:< Float =:= Double

toString for integral Floats and Doubles

Calling toString on a Float or a Double that holds an integral value, will not append ".0" to that value:

// Scala:    1.0
// Scala.js: 1

This is due to how numeric values are represented at runtime in Scala.js. Use a formatting interpolator if you always want to show decimals:

val x = 1.0
// Scala:    1.0
// Scala.js: 1.0


scala.Unit is represented using JavaScript's undefined. Therefore, calling toString() on Unit will return undefined rather than ().


JavaScript uses UCS-2 for encoding strings and does not support conversion to or from other character sets. As a result, String constructors taking Byte arrays are not supported by Scala.js.

JavaScript interoperability

The JavaScript interoperability feature is, in itself, a big semantic difference. However, its details are discussed in a dedicated page.


Java reflection and, a fortiori, Scala reflection, are not supported. There is limited support for java.lang.Class, e.g., obj.getClass.getName will work for any Scala.js object (not for objects that come from JavaScript interop).


In general, Scala.js supports exceptions, including catching them based on their type. However, exceptions that are typically triggered by the JVM have flaky semantics, in particular:

  • ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException is never thrown.
  • NullPointerException is reported as JavaScript TypeError instead.
  • StackOverflowError is unsupported since the underlying JavaScript exception type varies based on the browser.

Regular expressions

JavaScript regular expressions are slightly different from Java regular expressions. The support for regular expressions in Scala.js is implemented on top of JavaScript regexes.

This sometimes has an impact on functions in the Scala library that use regular expressions themselves. A list of known functions that are affected is given here:

  • StringLike.split(x: Array[Char]) (see issue #105)


scala.Symbol is supported, but is a potential source of memory leaks in applications that make heavy use of symbols. The main reason is that JavaScript does not support weak references, causing all symbols created by Scala.js tow remain in memory throughout the lifetime of the application.


The methods Value() and Value(i: Int) on scala.Enumeration use reflection to retrieve a string representation of the member name and are therefore -- in principle -- unsupported. However, since Enumerations are an integral part of the Scala library, Scala.js adds limited support for these two methods:

  1. Calls to either of these two methods of the forms:
    val <ident> = Value
    val <ident> = Value(<num>)
    are statically rewritten to (a slightly more complicated version of):
    val <ident> = Value("<ident>")
    val <ident> = Value(<num>,"<ident>")
    Note that this also includes calls like
    val A,B,C,D = Value
    since they are desugared into separate val definitions.
  2. Calls to either of these two methods which could not be rewritten, or calls to constructors of the protected Val class without an explicit name as parameter, will issue a warning.

Note that the name rewriting honors the nextName iterator. Therefore, the full rewrite is:

val <ident> = Value(
  if (nextName != null && nextName.hasNext)

We believe that this covers most use cases of scala.Enumeration. Please let us know if another (generalized) rewrite would make your life easier.